• Part of
    Ubiquity Network logo
    Download catalogue Join mailing list Announcement

    Read Chapter
  • No readable formats available
  • Rio de Janeiro: Spectacularization and Subjectivities in Globo’s city

    Barbara Peccei Szaniecki

    Chapter from the book: Briziarelli M. & Armano E. 2017. The Spectacle 2.0: Reading Debord in the Context of Digital Capitalism.

     Download

    With exuberant nature and wonderful events like Carnival, Rio de Janeiro has always had tourism as a source of funds. However, the ephemeral nature and uneven distribution of these activities required a more structured economical model. In the search for internal development and integration into global circuits, the city lives a process of ‘spectacularisation’. On the one hand, it has become the scene of an endless series of mega events including the World Cup (2014) and the Olympic Games (2016). On the other, it becomes a welcoming landscape of a monumentalization through the construction of three major museums signed by international architects that leverage a strong real estate speculation. All these changes are directly or indirectly related to the Globo Group, the largest media conglomerate (analogical and digital) of Brazil and one of the world's largest. The entire city - from its natural landscape to its cultural and creative outputs - became ‘an immense accumulation of spectacles’ according to Guy Debord and from this scenario emerges, in turn, a kind of subjectivity ‘Globo’, that is not very critical to new forms of exploitation of creative practices.

    Chapter Metrics:

    How to cite this chapter
    Szaniecki, B. 2017. Rio de Janeiro: Spectacularization and Subjectivities in Globo’s city. In: Briziarelli M. & Armano E (eds.), The Spectacle 2.0. London: University of Westminster Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/book11.g
    License

    This chapter distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution + Noncommercial + NoDerivatives 4.0 license. Copyright is retained by the author(s)

    Peer Review Information

    This book has been peer reviewed. See our Peer Review Policies for more information.

    Additional Information

    Published on Dec. 12, 2017

    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.16997/book11.g